• Learn More
  • Forgot your password?
  • Questions? Call us at 800-207-8001
Click here to find out more!
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
  • HOME
  • WHITE HOUSE
  • POLITICS
  • CONGRESS
  • DOMESTIC POLICY
  • NATIONAL SECURITY
  • TECH
  • COLUMNS
    • Political Connections by Ronald Brownstein
    • The Cook Report by Charlie Cook
    • Off to the Races by Charlie Cook
    • All Powers by Major Garrett
    • On The Trail by Reid Wilson
    • Against the Grain by Josh Kraushaar
    • Common Sense by Matthew Dowd
    • Gwen's Take by Gwen Ifill
    • Vantage Point
  • BLOGS
    • 2012 Decoded
    • On Call
    • Tech Daily Dose
    • Influence Alley
    • Expert Blogs
  • POLLS
    • Politics Insiders
    • Congress Insiders
    • Energy Insiders
    • National Security Insiders
    • Congressional Connection
  • EVENTS

Influence Alley Blog

Covington's STOCK Act Analysis

By Chris Frates
February 6, 2012 | 1:31 PM
  • Leave a Comment
Covington & Burling sent out a note this morning with an analysis of what the STOCK Act's registration requirement might mean for businesses. The short answer: a lot more public disclosure than they're used to. 

The firm writes in an email: 

February 6, 2012
SENATE PASSES DRAMATIC CHANGES TO LOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT: SOME INTELLIGENCE ON THE "POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE" PROVISIONS OF THE STOCK ACT

Last Thursday night, by a vote of 96-3, the U.S. Senate passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (the "STOCK Act"). While the bill's ban on insider trading by Congress has grabbed the headlines, the bill is of much more interest to the business community for a late amendment that added sweeping changes to federal lobbying law.

The bill first calls for the Comptroller General to submit to Congress a report that addresses, among other things, the potential benefits of imposing disclosure requirements on those who engage in "political intelligence activities." Curiously, however, it then goes on to impose substantial disclosure and registration requirements on those engaged in these activities without the benefit of such a report.

Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act ("LDA") as it now stands, an organization need not register with the Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House unless it employs an individual who (i) makes more than one federal "lobbying contact" for a client (the "client" could be the organization itself) and (ii) devotes 20% or more of his or her time for that client in a three-month period to federal lobbying activities. The STOCK Act would change that. If the Senate bill becomes law, some organizations would be required to register even if an employee makes just one lobbying contact and spends no time otherwise engaged in lobbying activities. As long as the information derived from the employee's lobbying contact "is intended for use in analyzing securities or commodities markets, or in informing investment decisions," the organization would have to register and file regular reports. Moreover, the employer and the employee -- called a "political intelligence consultant" -- would also have to file the same semiannual reports disclosing politically-related contributions that registrants and lobbyists must now file. Both the employer and the employee would also be required to certify in these reports that they have not given any gifts in violation of the House and Senate gift rules.

The effect of these changes would be quite significant for the business community. Hedge funds, private equity funds, and investment advisers (many of which are not currently registered under the LDA) might now be required either to register or to alter their business practices to avoid the need for registration. If, for example, a hedge fund calls a Congressional committee staffer to gather information about the status of a bill that relates to the fund's investment decisions, the fund may need to register. This would be so even if the fund was not otherwise engaged in lobbying. Moreover, the reach of the law, if enacted, would likely extend far beyond the financial services sector. For example, a company that seeks to gather information from covered federal officials regarding the likely congressional or regulatory reaction to a proposed merger or acquisition might be required to register.

The House is widely expected to pass a counterpart to the STOCK Act and the President has signaled a desire to enact a Congressional insider trading reform law. Whether that law will include the "political intelligence" provisions included in the Senate bill remains to be seen. We are closely monitoring developments and are available to advise on the likely impact on your organization.

Want to be even more influential? Get the most important posts sent right to your inbox.

Tags:

analysis, Covington & Burling, disclosure, STOCK Act
Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
About
Chris Frates
Staff

Chris Frates, National Journal reporter covering money, influence and politics.

Contact Influence Alley
Email: cfrates@nationaljournal.com

Follow @frates

Influence Alley editors reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments. National Journal Group, Inc. and Atlantic Media Company are not responsible for the content of the comments that remain.

Search This Blog
Resources
  • Open Secrets
  • Senate Office of Public Records’ Lobbying Database
  • The Sunlight Foundation’s Lobbying Tracker
  • The Sunlight Foundation’s Unlimited Money Tracker
  • Lobby Search
  • Foreign Agents Lookup
  • National Institute on Money in State Politics

Blogroll

  • Sunlight Foundation's Party Time
  • Roll Call Lobbying & Influence
  • Politico Influence
  • The BLT
  • The FOIA Blog
  • The Hill Business and Lobbying

Archives

Monthly Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011

Categories

  • 2012 Decoded

Recent Posts

  • 'Celebvocacy' One Offering at Feld's Shingle
  • Appeals Court Denies Stay in Campaign Finance Case
  • Watchdogs Criticize Government Contractor Disclosure Bill
  • Today's Influence Ads: AVMA Calls for APHIS Funding
  • Verizon-Cable Deal Sparks Messaging Battle
  • Dozens of NFIB Members Heading to Hill on Wednesday
  • U.S. Travel Gets Seat at TSA Table
  • NAM, Chamber Key Voting Ex-Im Vote
  • Republican Groups Form Super PAC to Mobilize Young Voters
  • Relationship Between Big Oil, White House Angers Congressional GOP

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic
Copyright © 2012 by National Journal Group Inc.
Powered by the Parse.ly Publisher Platform (P3).